Stephan Spencer's Scatterings

The Scattered Wisdom of a scientist turned web marketing virtuoso

March 2010
S M T W T F S
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Bidvertiser SO does not belong in Google's top 10 for "marketing"

The fact that the top spot for the term "marketing" in Google goes to Wikipedia is an appalling fact that I will rant on another day. For now I want to rant about Google's "choice" of Bidvertiser.com as a top 10 site for the term "marketing".

Clearly the Bidvertiser.com site is not one of the 10 most valuable resources for marketing information on the Internet. Their home page's keyword focus doesn't even seem to be about "marketing" -- indeed the word isn't in the title tag or in the page copy. Yet it's currently #5 for marketing, at least according to the Google datacenter I'm being served results from.

So how did this happen?

A lot of it has to do with the clever (that's a euphamism for "sneaky") use of the NOSCRIPT tag. If you start analyzing the back links, the anchor text used in those links, and the placement of those inlinks, you will see that Bidvertiser has furnished their publishers with some HTML code and Javascript to place on their pages. And it just so happens that the HTML code comes with a text link hidden within a <noscript> container!

Any guesses on what one of those words in the hidden link might be? Yup. "Marketing". Here is what the hidden link looks like (this taken from binodc.com):

<noscript><a href="http://www.bidvertiser.com">affiliate program marketing</a></noscript>
Now binodc.com on its own doesn't have enough link importance to have much of an impact, but with all the publishers on Bidvertiser's network including this hidden link, you could see how this would sway Google. Some of these publishers may even be authority sites with a lot of trust built up (not to mention PageRank) and part of really good neighborhoods. I am rather astounded that Bidvertiser could occupy a top 10 spot for such a competitive term as "marketing", given that these links are hidden in noscripts and clearly not "earned" in the sense that a traditional link is. But there you have it, another Google loophole being exploited.

I haven't done the research to find which links I think are the vital few (versus the trivial many) that are pushing Bidvertizer into the top of the SERPs. But I do wonder if the publishers realize the value they are giving away to Bidvertiser without compensation. I'd guess it's without their knowledge or understanding.

I wonder how long it is going to take before Google discounts links wrapped within noscript completely. Until then, sites like Bidvertiser.com will be able to take advantage of their publishers and of the search engines, to the detriment of the user.

Posted by Stephan Spencer on 01/29/2007 | Permalink

Comments (6)| Comments RSS | Filed under: Search Engines anchor text, hidden links, noscript, pagerank, seo            

5 comments, 1 pingback

  1. #10 for my data center, but whatever you're right it doesn't belong there and that does seem to be an obvious loophole in the algorithm that would provide juice like that based on what are effectively hidden links...infact it seems too obvious, how can that possibly be?!

    Comment by Charles [Visitor] Email · http://www.surfarama.com — 01/30/07 @ 04:47


  2. Spamdexing with hidden links using the Z-INDEX technique... People who spam the search engines are determined to get the most possible visibility and public awareness for their site. I want to do my fair share and lend a helping hand to promote them and how good they are at spamming, free of charge. So here&#39...

    Pingback by Sante's Blog [Visitor] — 01/30/07 @ 04:54


  3. How long will it take Google to pick up on this nasty little trick?

    Comment by n8er [Visitor] Email · http://www.tpbusa.com — 01/30/07 @ 08:06


  4. How quickly Google will react depends on whether Matt Cutts read this post or not. :-)

    Comment by Stephan Spencer [Member] Email — 02/01/07 @ 02:13


  5. Clever move of bidvertiser, but how long will it last...and after google change this hole, for sure, bidvertiser will take a big fall in the serps.

    Comment by Jonix [Visitor] Email · http://birds.allaboutthese.org — 02/02/07 @ 12:38


  6. They're currently number one on Google for "make money" and "internet marketing".

    Got to be a lesson there.

    Comment by Charles [Visitor] Email · http://www.diskvision.net — 02/11/07 @ 12:28


Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)