Stephan Spencer's Scatterings

The Scattered Wisdom of a scientist turned web marketing virtuoso

November 2008
S M T W T F S
 << <   > >>
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

How the Words "Click Here" Can Hurt Your Rankings

Whether you post on blogs or run a website, at some point or another you've probably come across anchor text that reads, "click here." Every time you add anchor text with words like "here," "more," or "this," you are sending a message to the search engines that that simple word is what your link is all about. The end result doesn't change much for humans, but it does mean something to the search engines. If you are interested in ranking for particular keywords, you'll want to pay close attention to your anchor text.

My article on CNet, which can be found on my CNet: Searchlight blog, talks about why you should implement keywords in your anchor text links on your site to help boost your rankings.

Posted by Stephan Spencer on 11/13/2007 | Permalink

Comments (0)| Comments RSS | Filed under: Content, Online Retail ,            

Bidvertiser SO does not belong in Google's top 10 for "marketing"

The fact that the top spot for the term "marketing" in Google goes to Wikipedia is an appalling fact that I will rant on another day. For now I want to rant about Google's "choice" of Bidvertiser.com as a top 10 site for the term "marketing".

Clearly the Bidvertiser.com site is not one of the 10 most valuable resources for marketing information on the Internet. Their home page's keyword focus doesn't even seem to be about "marketing" -- indeed the word isn't in the title tag or in the page copy. Yet it's currently #5 for marketing, at least according to the Google datacenter I'm being served results from.

So how did this happen?

A lot of it has to do with the clever (that's a euphamism for "sneaky") use of the NOSCRIPT tag. If you start analyzing the back links, the anchor text used in those links, and the placement of those inlinks, you will see that Bidvertiser has furnished their publishers with some HTML code and Javascript to place on their pages. And it just so happens that the HTML code comes with a text link hidden within a <noscript> container!

Any guesses on what one of those words in the hidden link might be? Yup. "Marketing". Here is what the hidden link looks like (this taken from binodc.com):

<noscript><a href="http://www.bidvertiser.com">affiliate program marketing</a></noscript>
Now binodc.com on its own doesn't have enough link importance to have much of an impact, but with all the publishers on Bidvertiser's network including this hidden link, you could see how this would sway Google. Some of these publishers may even be authority sites with a lot of trust built up (not to mention PageRank) and part of really good neighborhoods. I am rather astounded that Bidvertiser could occupy a top 10 spot for such a competitive term as "marketing", given that these links are hidden in noscripts and clearly not "earned" in the sense that a traditional link is. But there you have it, another Google loophole being exploited.

I haven't done the research to find which links I think are the vital few (versus the trivial many) that are pushing Bidvertizer into the top of the SERPs. But I do wonder if the publishers realize the value they are giving away to Bidvertiser without compensation. I'd guess it's without their knowledge or understanding.

I wonder how long it is going to take before Google discounts links wrapped within noscript completely. Until then, sites like Bidvertiser.com will be able to take advantage of their publishers and of the search engines, to the detriment of the user.

Posted by Stephan Spencer on 01/29/2007 | Permalink

Comments (6)| Comments RSS | Filed under: Search Engines , , , ,