Stephan Spencer's Scatterings

The Scattered Wisdom of a scientist turned web marketing virtuoso

September 2008
S M T W T F S
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

For Microsoft, there's always the "nuclear option"

I just had a very enjoyable dinner with my colleague Alan Rimm-Kaufman, founder of paid search firm, Rimm-Kaufman Group. We always have such thought-provoking conversations whenever we meet up. This evening was no exception.

At one point our conversation turned to Microsoft. What can they do about Google and Yahoo eating their lunch? Microsoft has become an "also ran" in the paid search space. They are so far behind in paid search (organic search, too, for that matter), that it's going to take a miracle for them to pull out from behind. Or not? Could they perhaps launch a devastating nuclear attack against Google, wiping out the entire paid search industry in the process? Believe it or not, the answer is "yes," and the approach would be surprisingly simple and inexpensive for Microsoft to implement...

Alan described Paul Bryant's "doomsday" scenario to me as follows (hat tip to Alan, btw)... Microsoft simply introduces a Google ad blocker to Windows (which works in IE and Firefox) and pushes it out through a Windows Update. And here's the kicker -- Microsoft turns it ON by default! Of course they will also have to block their own ads, so they don't get nailed under anti-trust laws.

Scary.

Posted by Stephan Spencer on 04/19/2007 | Permalink

Comments (3)| Comments RSS | Filed under: Search Engines alan rimm-kaufman, google, microsoft, paid search, ppc, search engine marketing            

3 comments

  1. How About, Google Starts giving away free OS, with a free phone, and free wi fi connection... Hum MS has fallen behind and it seems its too late for them, its only downhill from here.
    my 2 cents

    Comment by george [Visitor] Email — 04/20/07 @ 09:51


  2. Simple, inexpensive? I don't think so. The backlash, the lawsuits, forget about it. Microsoft is a public company, remember.

    But what I don't get is why one would think Microsoft would have to revert to a "nuclear" option just because they're losing to Google on search advertising. Sure, Google is encroaching on MSFT's turf, and I'm sure many in Redmond are annoyed, but last I checked MSFT was still making money selling all different kinds of software. They just happen to have a media business, so it seems everyone believes Google's going to eliminate them.

    The reality is that Microsoft is well positioned to remain relevant in the years to come, more so than their own rivals from the past - Novell, IBM, Lotus.

    Comment by Todd Simmons [Visitor] Email · http://www.sitesquad.net — 04/20/07 @ 20:05


  3. I think Microsoft tried the other nuclear option in trying to buy Yahoo to increase marketshare.
    There are always non-nuclear options

    Comment by Jason [Visitor] Email · http://www.southwestseo.com — 05/08/07 @ 20:50


Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)