<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/3.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>An SEO &#38; Web Marketing Blog: Scatterings - Latest comments on Corporate blogging policy - IBM has one</title>
		<link>http://www.stephanspencer.com/?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.stephanspencer.com/?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=212" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=3.3.1"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>Kelsey Ruger [Visitor] in response to: Corporate blogging policy - IBM has one</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Kelsey Ruger [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c3088@http://www.stephanspencer.com/</guid>
			<description>Looks like Juicy Fruit needs to read IBM's policy. Take a look at this absolutely ridiculous &quot;blog&quot; they have on their site. This is truly a manifestation of everything thing that could be wrong with a blog. http://www.juicyfruit.com/?fromEmail=yes&amp;amp;emailSection=hercules_landing&amp;amp;blog_day=39&lt;br /&gt;It's and ad - and not even a good one. Maybe they aren't even ready for a policy - they need blogging 101.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Looks like Juicy Fruit needs to read IBM's policy. Take a look at this absolutely ridiculous "blog" they have on their site. This is truly a manifestation of everything thing that could be wrong with a blog. http://www.juicyfruit.com/?fromEmail=yes&amp;emailSection=hercules_landing&amp;blog_day=39<br />It's and ad - and not even a good one. Maybe they aren't even ready for a policy - they need blogging 101.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.stephanspencer.com/blogging/corporate-blogging-policy-ibm-has-one#c3088</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>Carlo Odello [Visitor] in response to: Corporate blogging policy - IBM has one</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Carlo Odello [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c3072@http://www.stephanspencer.com/</guid>
			<description>I just wonder how much effective it can be... Can you really protect your company by the use of such a policy? It seems to be they are trying to influence in someway their employees, but they still know it is not the effective way.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I just wonder how much effective it can be... Can you really protect your company by the use of such a policy? It seems to be they are trying to influence in someway their employees, but they still know it is not the effective way.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.stephanspencer.com/blogging/corporate-blogging-policy-ibm-has-one#c3072</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
